A Door Dedicated to Death in the World’s Most Powerful Church

To the left of the main entrance of St. Peter’s Basil­i­ca in Vat­i­can City stands a con­tro­ver­sial bronze door that does not cel­e­brate vic­to­ry, sal­va­tion, or tri­umph. Instead, it con­fronts vis­i­tors with some­thing the Church has rarely cho­sen to depict so direct­ly: death itself.

Known as the Por­ta del­la Morte, or the Door of the Dead, it is the most con­tention­al mod­ern art­works on dis­play in Vat­i­can City as well as one of its most unique archi­tec­tur­al ele­ments cre­at­ed in recent mem­o­ry. The defin­ing work of the Ital­ian sculp­tor Gia­co­mo Manzù, the door was installed in 1964 in the door­way tra­di­tion­al­ly used as the exit for funer­al pro­ces­sions in the basil­i­ca.

Mea­sur­ing 20 feet in height, the door is com­posed of ten bronze reliefs arranged in five rows, framed by a ver­ti­cal motif of vine and wheat, the Eucharis­tic sym­bols of wine and bread. At the top are the Death of Christ and the Death of Mary, ren­dered in elon­gat­ed, almost weight­less forms that remain leg­i­ble even from the steps of the basil­i­ca.

Below, bib­li­cal and eccle­si­as­ti­cal deaths are inter­wo­ven with mod­ern tragedies: Abel mur­dered by his broth­er, the qui­et pass­ing of Saint Joseph, the mar­tyr­dom of Saint Stephen, the deaths of Saint Peter and Pope Gre­go­ry VII, and the recent death of Pope John XXIII him­self, includ­ed as an explic­it act of homage.

At the base of the door, almost invis­i­ble to the hur­ried vis­i­tor, six ani­mals are mod­eled in low relief: a black­bird, a dor­mouse, a hedge­hog, an owl, a tor­toise, and a raven. Drawn from medieval sym­bol­ic tra­di­tion, they evoke sleep, time, vig­i­lance, decay, and fore­knowl­edge, qui­et­ly rein­forc­ing the theme of mor­tal­i­ty.

On the reverse side, fac­ing the inte­ri­or of St. Peter’s, Manzù depict­ed the open­ing pro­ces­sion of the Sec­ond Vat­i­can Coun­cil, the defin­ing moment of John XXIII’s pon­tif­i­cate. The long relief includes the Pope him­self as well as Don Giuseppe De Luca, a sub­tle ded­i­ca­tion to the sculptor’s close friend and icono­graph­ic advi­sor, who died before the work was com­plet­ed.

How­ev­er, most con­tro­ver­sial was the low­er sec­tion of the out­side, which depicts scenes not strict­ly relat­ed to Chris­tian­i­ty but rather the hor­rors of his­to­ry and nature: death by vio­lence, death in the air, death on earth, as well as the death of Pope John XXIII as a trib­ute to the pon­tiff who had sup­port­ed the door’s cre­ation and who was unable to live to see his work com­plet­ed. One pan­el in par­tic­u­lar drew espe­cial­ly strong crit­i­cism, in which a car­di­nal gazes at a man hang­ing upside down, alleged­ly ref­er­enc­ing the hang­ing exe­cu­tions of Ital­ian fas­cists after the Sec­ond World War.

Anoth­er alludes to anony­mous deaths in war and mod­ern cat­a­stro­phe, a visu­al ref­er­ence to the vio­lent polit­i­cal and social reck­on­ings of Italy at that time. Despite the protests of some cler­gy, Manzù main­tained his cre­ative vision, even deny­ing the request of one prelate to include latin inscrip­tions to accom­pa­ny the images of Christ, Mary, and the saints, stat­ing “I can’t put words on these pan­els. This is not a com­ic strip.”

Per­haps the most emo­tion­al­ly dev­as­tat­ing pan­el is Death on Earth, posi­tioned at the low­er right and serv­ing as the final state­ment in this sequence on mor­tal­i­ty. Here, a name­less, worn woman col­laps­es against a tip­ping chair, while a child looks on in ter­ror, cry­ing as he wit­ness­es his mother’s last moments. The restrained, ten­der mod­el­ing of the fig­ures trans­forms the act of dying into some­thing both inti­mate and inex­orable, with the imma­nent pull of grav­i­ty as a result of the chair falling over con­vey­ing the imme­di­a­cy of the loss.

Var­i­ous prepara­to­ry ver­sions of the Death of Mary pan­el.

The his­to­ry of the door begins in 1947 when a com­pe­ti­tion to cre­ate a new set of doors for St. Peter’s Basil­i­ca was announced under Pope Pius XII, and the win­ner was cho­sen to be Gia­co­mo Manzù, a sculp­tor from Berg­amo, already known for his sculp­tures and bas-reliefs depict­ing car­di­nals and bib­li­cal scenes, cul­mi­nat­ing in an exhi­bi­tion in Milan in 1941. While he was cho­sen for the work under Pope Pius, it was ulti­mate­ly the next Pope and friend of many years, John XXIII, whose per­son­al sup­port allowed Manzù to trans­form what was meant to be a con­ven­tion­al cel­e­bra­tion of saints and mar­tyrs into a far more trou­bling med­i­ta­tion on mor­tal­i­ty, vio­lence, and human suf­fer­ing.

Born in Berg­amo in 1908, the son of a poor shoe­mak­er, Manzù was large­ly self-taught. At age of 11, he took on a job assist­ing a local car­pen­ter, going on to work on plas­ter dec­o­ra­tions. It is said his first works of art were fig­ures he mod­eled from left­over can­dle wax in the church where his father worked as a sac­ristan. His ear­ly fame came from aus­tere sculp­tures of car­di­nals and emo­tion­al­ly restrained reli­gious reliefs, but his work con­sis­tent­ly mixed ele­ments of the sacred, the erot­ic, and the polit­i­cal. Over a career of almost sev­en­ty years he pro­duced busts of celebri­ties, female nudes, and mon­u­ments for insti­tu­tions rang­ing from the Unit­ed Nations to the Rock­e­feller Cen­ter, and even stage designs for Igor Stravin­sky’s opera Oedi­pus Rex, cre­at­ed at the com­poser’s request.

From the begin­ning, Vat­i­can offi­cials were opposed to his insis­tence that the door should rep­re­sent not heav­en­ly glo­ry but the earth­ly real­i­ty of death. The orig­i­nal title, The Tri­umph of Saints and Mar­tyrs, was replaced, with John XXIII’s approval, by the stark and final theme of Death, fol­low­ing lengthy dia­logues between the two men. Manzù inter­pret­ed it not only as a pas­sage to divine reward but as an event marked by grief, injus­tice, and vio­lence, insist­ing that sanc­ti­ty could not be sep­a­rat­ed from his­to­ry, and chose to depict it using clas­si­cal sculp­tur­al tra­di­tions he was known for, but dis­card­ing the aca­d­e­m­ic ele­ments many would com­mon­ly expect to see when wit­ness­ing a work of art in the Church.

The project haunt­ed Manzù for near­ly sev­en­teen years. He repeat­ed­ly aban­doned it, rethought it, and near­ly destroyed it in moments of cri­sis. Dur­ing this long ges­ta­tion he pro­duced a par­al­lel set of doors for the Salzburg Cathe­dral in Aus­tria, effec­tive­ly using them as a rehearsal for the Vat­i­can work. The delays were not only artis­tic, Manzù was an athe­ist, open­ly sym­pa­thet­ic to social­ism and com­mu­nism, deeply sus­pi­cious of insti­tu­tion­al author­i­ty, and wide­ly regard­ed with­in the Curia as an ide­o­log­i­cal­ly inap­pro­pri­ate choice for so promi­nent a sacred com­mis­sion. Fol­low­ing the death of Pope John XXIII, who in life urged Manzù to fin­ish the work, he final­ly com­plet­ed it a year lat­er.

The door was inau­gu­rat­ed in 1964, a year after John XXIII’s death, dur­ing the very coun­cil he had sum­moned to renew the Church. Vat­i­can resis­tance did not dis­ap­pear, but the work could no longer be undone. Manzù, once con­sid­ered dis­re­spect­ful of the Church’s icono­graph­ic tra­di­tion and list­ed among the Holy Office’s “unwor­thy” artists (along with names such as Rena­to Gut­tuso) had per­ma­nent­ly altered the visu­al lan­guage of Catholic mon­u­men­tal art.

The strained rela­tion­ship with the Roman Curia, owing to Manzù’s beliefs may have lead to the work’s undo­ing had it not been for his friend­ship with the late Pope, who under­stood and appre­ci­at­ed his vision, fol­low­ing a meet­ing between them when Manzù was called to sculpt his like­ness. This meet­ing proved to be cru­cial, where, despite their dif­fer­ing views, a life­long mutu­al respect between the artist and pon­tiff was estab­lished, the lat­ter who was also from Berg­amo. Lat­er, in a 1988 inter­view with La Stam­pa, Manzù states “They say I’m a Marx­ist. That’s not true. I’ve nev­er even been a mem­ber of the Com­mu­nist Par­ty. But I feel like a com­mu­nist in the sense that I desire a more fra­ter­nal and peace­ful human­i­ty. For me, being on the left is a more human choice than a polit­i­cal one.”

His rep­u­ta­tion among mem­bers of the Church was not total­ly neg­a­tive, and in time he found sup­port­ers in mem­bers of the cler­gy such as Dom Hélder Câmara, Brazil­ian Arch­bish­op of Olin­da and Recife, also known as the “Bish­op of the Fave­las,” who famous­ly said: “When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Com­mu­nist.” Years lat­er, he was grant­ed a com­mis­sion to work on a third door, this time for the St. Lau­rens Church in Rot­ter­dam, intend­ed as a sym­bol of recon­struc­tion fol­low­ing the destruc­tion of WWII, anoth­er dis­play of the artist’s life­long com­mit­ment to peace.

Today the Door of Death is wide­ly regard­ed as Manzù’s great­est achieve­ment, a fusion of the sec­u­lar and the reli­gious. It does not con­sole, instruct, or ide­al­ize. It insists that death is not abstract, not dis­tant, and not pure­ly spir­i­tu­al, but human, polit­i­cal, and his­tor­i­cal. In the world’s most pow­er­ful basil­i­ca, it stands as a rare acknowl­edg­ment that sanc­ti­ty and suf­fer­ing are insep­a­ra­ble, and that even in bronze, the Church can­not escape the grav­i­ty of the human con­di­tion. “I live for peace and have a fero­cious hatred of war. Time proves me more and more right.” he stat­ed in a 1977 inerview for Cor­riere del­la Sera.

Manzù, through­out his life, main­tained a con­stant dia­logue between the Church and com­mu­nism and described his rela­tion­ship with Pope John XXIII in these terms: “Our meet­ing point was char­i­ty, that is, what had to be done for men, for the fra­ter­nal coex­is­tence of all in this world full of hate.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *