A City Dressing Itself: 90s London Fashion Through The Lens of Shoichi Aoki

Begin­ning the 80s, Japan­ese pho­tog­ra­ph­er Shoichi Aoki has qui­et­ly built one of the most reveal­ing visu­al records of Lon­don street style, cap­tur­ing the city’s ravers, goths, artists, and club kids at a moment when fash­ion was still local, hand­made, and deeply tied to sub­cul­ture. Pub­lished in Japan’s Street Mag­a­zine, these pho­tographs offered an unfil­tered view of how youth iden­ti­ty was being con­struct­ed on London’s side­walks long before social media.

A decade before the inter­net made fash­ion glob­al­ly acces­si­ble, the way most dis­cov­ered what peo­ple in oth­er cities around the world were wear­ing was to pur­chase fash­ion mag­a­zines such as Street. Found­ed in 1985 by Japan­ese pho­tog­ra­ph­er Shoichi Aoki, the mag­a­zine became a cru­cial win­dow for Tokyo’s fash­ion-con­scious crowds to view their equiv­a­lents abroad.

Since then, Aoki has trav­eled reg­u­lar­ly to the UK, US, and Europe, par­tic­u­lar­ly stay­ing in Lon­don, pho­tograph­ing inter­est­ing peo­ple on the street in Soho, Cam­den, and around the city, with no cer­tain regard for age or back­ground, pre­sent­ing their out­fits with the same direct, doc­u­men­tary approach he used when he got his start doc­u­ment­ing fash­ion in Tokyo’s Hara­juku dis­trict. Rather than treat­ing Lon­don fash­ion as some­thing dic­tat­ed by design­ers or run­ways, Street Mag­a­zine framed it as a liv­ing, self-authored cul­ture, allow­ing younger Japan­ese read­ers to see how per­son­al iden­ti­ty was being con­struct­ed in real time on anoth­er con­ti­nent, a direct pre­cur­sor to the way per­son­al fash­ion is glob­al­ly pre­sent­ed and shared on social media today.

These pho­tographs, shot and pub­lished in Street between 1993 and 2000, show the styles of the time, at once slight­ly leg­i­ble to us and dif­fer­ent in ways lost to the ebb and flow of trends, offer­ing a more authen­tic view of the era than the nos­tal­gi­cal­ly curat­ed ver­sion usu­al­ly seen when cur­rent trends ref­er­ence the decade. In these por­traits you can see styles we now call cyber Y2K, whim­sig­oth, and raver as they actu­al­ly exist­ed dur­ing their peak.

What makes Aoki’s Lon­don work espe­cial­ly com­pelling is that it cap­tures a city in cul­tur­al flux. The mid-to-late 1990s were a moment when British youth cul­ture was splin­ter­ing and quick­ly evolv­ing: Brit­pop was giv­ing way to dark­er post-rave aes­thet­ics, Cam­den was becom­ing a cross­roads of cyber­goth and neo-hip­pie styles, and Soho remained a mag­net for club kids, fash­ion and art stu­dents, musi­cians, and out­siders. Aoki pho­tographed all of it with­out hier­ar­chy. A stu­dent in over­sized poly­ester pants, a goth in metal­lic make­up, or a raver in over­sized dyed dread­locks were giv­en the same neu­tral fram­ing: full-length, cen­tered, and usu­al­ly unposed. This was not edi­to­r­i­al fash­ion pho­tog­ra­phy but visu­al anthro­pol­o­gy, a method that made Street feel clos­er to a soci­o­log­i­cal record than a glossy mag­a­zine.

Aoki’s approach was decep­tive­ly sim­ple. He worked with a straight­for­ward 35mm cam­era, nat­ur­al light, and a con­sis­tent street-lev­el van­tage point. There was no styling, no retouch­ing, and no attempt to smooth over awk­ward­ness, some­times even ful­ly blur­ry pho­tos were pub­lished, or pho­tos that did­n’t even fea­ture peo­ple at all, some­times Aoki opt­ed to shoot a scarerow in rags on the side of the street or old teapots on dis­play at a boot sale. The result was an archive of cul­ture and clothes as they were actu­al­ly worn: orange or pink-dyed hair, reflec­tive fab­rics, wrin­kled vinyl, mes­sen­ger bags, bright­ly con­trast­ing col­or clothes, and DIY mod­i­fi­ca­tions that rarely sur­vive in the mind of the mass con­scious­ness when it comes to look­ing back at the decade. This is one of the rea­sons Aoki’s Lon­don pho­tographs have become so valu­able today. They pre­serve not just trends, but the tex­ture of every­day exper­i­men­ta­tion, and the last hold­outs of region­al cul­ture, before algo­rithms made every­thing avail­able to every­one, for bet­ter or worse.

In Japan, Street Mag­a­zine had already estab­lished itself as a cult pub­li­ca­tion by the ear­ly 1990s. It was one of the first mag­a­zines any­where in the world to treat ordi­nary peo­ple on the street as legit­i­mate fash­ion sub­jects. Aoki’s orig­i­nal Hara­juku cov­er­age helped launch the idea that sub­cul­tures, rather than design­ers, were dri­ving fash­ion for­ward. When he applied this same lens to Lon­don, it cre­at­ed a ver­i­ta­ble cross-cul­tur­al feed­back loop: British youth could unknow­ing­ly influ­ence Japan­ese style, while Japan­ese read­ers were see­ing a par­al­lel under­ground evolve thou­sands of miles away. In this sense, Aoki’s work antic­i­pat­ed the glob­al­ized fash­ion ecosys­tem of Insta­gram, Tum­blr, and Tik­Tok by decades.

The Lon­don images also reveal how much of what feels “cur­rent” in fash­ion is actu­al­ly recy­cled from that peri­od. Cyber-inspired eye­wear, trib­al tat­toos, chaot­ic char­i­ty-shop lay­er­ing, plat­form boots, mesh tops, and rave sil­hou­ettes that dom­i­nate con­tem­po­rary trend cycles all appear in Aoki’s 1990s pho­tographs in their orig­i­nal, less famil­iar forms. What is strik­ing is how unbrand­ed these looks often were. Before the advent of streetwear, logos were sec­ondary to sil­hou­ette, col­or, and per­son­al styling, rein­forc­ing the idea that iden­ti­ty was the real engine of street fash­ion.

Beyond Street, Shoichi Aoki is per­haps best known inter­na­tion­al­ly for FRUiTS, the mag­a­zine he launched in 1997, which focused almost exclu­sive­ly on Hara­juku style. FRUiTS became a glob­al phe­nom­e­non, shap­ing how the world under­stood Japan­ese youth cul­ture and inspir­ing design­ers, styl­ists, and pho­tog­ra­phers across Europe and the Unit­ed States. Yet the Lon­don work in Street shows anoth­er side of Aoki’s career: a rov­ing doc­u­men­tar­i­an of glob­al sub­cul­ture, qui­et­ly assem­bling one of the most impor­tant youth cul­ture archives of the late twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, often com­pared to the con­ti­nent-hop­ping work of Joji Hashiguchi, anoth­er Tokyo pho­tog­ra­ph­er.

Aoki has often said that he does not judge what he pho­tographs, he sim­ply records it. That phi­los­o­phy is what gives his Lon­don street pho­tog­ra­phy its last­ing pow­er. These images are not try­ing to flat­ter, sell, or mythol­o­gize their sub­jects. They let peo­ple exist as they were, in a moment when style was still large­ly built offline, through clubs, record shops, flea mar­kets, and scenes that were local before they were glob­al.

Today, as fash­ion cycles accel­er­ate and the inter­net col­laps­es geo­graph­ic bound­aries, Aoki’s Lon­don pho­tographs from 1993 to 2000 feel almost rad­i­cal in their slow­ness and speci­fici­ty. They show a time when dis­cov­er­ing how peo­ple dressed in anoth­er city required curios­i­ty, phys­i­cal trav­el, and a print­ed mag­a­zine passed from hand to hand. In pre­serv­ing that world, Shoichi Aoki did more than doc­u­ment street fash­ion, cap­tur­ing the last era before style became glob­al.

Four decades on, Aok­i’s mag­a­zines con­tin­ue to exist today, albeit with a much more irreg­u­lar out­put, its niche long hav­ing been filled by insta­gram and oth­er social media feeds, although this is not to say Aok­i’s pho­tog­ra­phy has slowed down by any means, as he has tak­en to the same plat­form to present his work direct­ly to its fans. How­ev­er, those curi­ous to study the styles of old and become inspired by the peo­ple of that only coun­try which can­not be trav­eled to, the past, may do so by find­ing sur­viv­ing old print copies for sale, or by pur­chas­ing dig­i­tal­ly scanned com­pi­la­tions of the mag­a­zines from Aoki him­self at his web­site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *